Posts Tagged ‘Vista’

Microsoft Office 2010 Beta

So I am going through my email yes­ter­day and I come across an email from Tech­Net announ­cing the beta of Mic­ro­soft 2010.

Even though I am a huge sup­por­ter of Open Office, I deci­ded to give it a try. Since I already had a Hot­mail account, the regis­tra­tion was very sim­ple and within 5 minu­tes I was down­loa­ding the installer.

One of the first things I noti­ced when I began to ins­tall the appli­ca­tion, was the options that were not selec­ted. As seen in this screenshot, very few fea­tu­res are ins­ta­lled by default.

The ins­tall did seem to take a bit lon­ger than nor­mal, how much was part of the ins­ta­ller ver­sus my test machine is unde­ci­ded. None the less the ins­ta­ller did not take more than 20 minu­tes or so. Since I spend more time in the Word appli­ca­tion that was where I hea­ded first. It does appear that MS did lis­ten to a lot of users con­cer­ning the start orb and has repla­ced it with the File tab. The remain­der of the rib­bon bar looks remar­kably the same.

When you do go to the file tab, you get a lot more infor­ma­tion at your mouse point without having to do a lot of digging.

So off I go. As I men­tio­ned I use Open Office by default, so the first thing I did was open one of my docu­ments crea­ted in Wri­ter. It did take a few moments to bring the docu­ment up, but all of my for­mat­ting (such as it was) remai­ned. I could even save it back into the .odt exten­sion. There was the war­ning that the for­mat was not com­ple­tely com­pa­ti­ble. I ope­ned the file in Wri­ter again and everything was gol­den. That was a big check mark in my books right there. Mic­ro­soft has been drug over the coals (right­fully so) for not being more com­pa­ti­ble with other appli­ca­tions, this is a good step forward.

The next thing I wan­ted to look at was how it hand­les wri­ting to a blog (not just Mic­ro­soft Live spa­ces). I rea­li­zed how happy I was for the file menu to be back. With a cou­ple of clicks I was being promp­ted to setup my blog con­nec­tion. I selec­ted Word­press and ente­red the ser­ver and login infor­ma­tion. Next time I know, I am wri­ting the entry right now. One of the great fea­tu­res is the screenshot fea­ture. Like the snip­ping tool in Vista and Win­dows 7, the screenshot tool is won­der­ful. When you go to insert you see the option screenshot, with the down arrow, you have the abi­lity to just grab a full win­dow or use the snip­ping tool. All of the ima­ges in this post were crea­ted using this format.

So far, I must say I am actually impres­sed with the direc­tion of at least the Word por­tion. I will play with the excel por­tion later. Check back…

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Diego - November 19, 2009 at 9:06 am

Categories: Reviews   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

What’s old is new again

Yes­ter­day, Mic­ro­soft put out an advi­sory to a secu­rity vul­ne­ra­bi­lity spe­ci­fic to the Win­dows Vista, Win­dows Ser­ver 2008 SP2, and Win­dows 7 RC ope­ra­ting sys­tems.  No other Win­dows ope­ra­ting sys­tems, inc­lu­ding Win­dows 7 RTM are impacted.

Holy cow, once again the older sys­tems (you go XP) are more secure then the new sys­tems.  Why is that you say?  Well this exploit was first found a decade ago.  Yes, you did read that correct, in 1999 this was dis­co­ve­red and patched for the ope­ra­ting sys­tems at the time.  Yet no one thought to put that into the: Newest, Most Secure, Latest and Grea­test ope­ra­ting systems.

So what is this vulnerability?

Accor­ding to Microsoft:

What might an attac­ker use this vul­ne­ra­bi­lity to do?
An attac­ker who suc­cess­fully exploi­ted this vul­ne­ra­bi­lity could take com­plete con­trol of an affec­ted sys­tem. Most attempts to exploit this vul­ne­ra­bi­lity will cause an affec­ted sys­tem to stop res­pon­ding and restart.

I like the last four words, “stop res­pon­ding and res­tart”.  We had an acronym for that back in the day.  BSOD.  But out of all of this, the thing that bothers me the most is Microsoft’s response:

Mic­ro­soft is con­cer­ned that this new report of a vul­ne­ra­bi­lity was not res­pon­sibly disc­lo­sed, poten­tially put­ting com­pu­ter users at risk. We con­ti­nue to encou­rage res­pon­si­ble disc­lo­sure of vul­ne­ra­bi­li­ties. We believe the com­monly accep­ted prac­tice of repor­ting vul­ne­ra­bi­li­ties directly to a ven­dor ser­ves everyone’s best inte­rests. This prac­tice helps to ensure that cus­to­mers receive com­prehen­sive, high-quality upda­tes for secu­rity vul­ne­ra­bi­li­ties without expo­sure to mali­cious attac­kers while the update is being developed.

Mic­ro­soft is con­cer­ned that this new report of a vul­ne­ra­bi­lity was not res­pon­sibly disc­lo­sed? Excuse me what?  It’s not new, it was disc­lo­sed pro­perly the first time.  Why do others become res­pon­si­ble for your oversight?

With that said Mic­ro­soft has issued two do it your­self reso­lu­tions until they can get a patch pushed.

The first is to Disa­ble SMB2 in the registry:

Impact of wor­ka­round. Host will not be able to com­mu­ni­cate using SMB2.

  1. Click Start, click Run, type Rege­dit in the Open box, and then click OK.
  2. Locate and then click the follo­wing registry sub­key:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services
  3. Click Lan­man­Ser­ver.
  4. Click Para­me­ters.
  5. Right-click to add a new DWORD (32 bit) Value.
  6. Enter smb2 in the Name data field, and change the Value data field to 0.
  7. Exit.
  8. Res­tart the “Ser­ver” ser­vice by per­for­ming one of the following:
    • Open up the com­pu­ter mana­ge­ment MMC, navi­gate to Ser­vi­ces and Appli­ca­tions, click Ser­vi­ces, right-click the Ser­ver ser­vice name and click Res­tart. Ans­wer Yes in the pop-up menu.
    • From a com­mand prompt and with admi­nis­tra­tor pri­vi­le­ges, type net stop ser­ver and then net start ser­ver.

The second is to Block TCP ports 139 and 445 at the firewall:

Impact of Wor­ka­round: Seve­ral Win­dows ser­vi­ces use the affec­ted ports. Bloc­king con­nec­ti­vity to the ports may cause various appli­ca­tions or ser­vi­ces to not func­tion. Some of the appli­ca­tions or ser­vi­ces that could be impac­ted are lis­ted below:

  • Appli­ca­tions that use SMB (CIFS)
  • Appli­ca­tions that use mails­lots or named pipes (RPC over SMB)
  • Ser­ver (File and Print Sharing)
  • Group Policy
  • Net Logon
  • Dis­tri­bu­ted File Sys­tem (DFS)
  • Ter­mi­nal Ser­ver Licensing
  • Print Spoo­ler
  • Com­pu­ter Browser
  • Remote Pro­ce­dure Call Locator
  • Fax Ser­vice
  • Inde­xing Service
  • Per­for­mance Logs and Alerts
  • Sys­tems Mana­ge­ment Server
  • License Log­ging Service

Per­so­nally, I would block those on your inter­net facing fire­wall of you broad­band router.

1 comment - What do you think?  Posted by Diego - September 10, 2009 at 8:43 am

Categories: Windows   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Flip 3D your Firefox Tabs

Loo­king at all the evi­dence pre­sen­ted to me, Fire­fox is making major stri­des in brow­ser pre­fe­rence among web sur­fers.  I know it is my brow­ser of choice.

One of my favo­rite things are the addons.  Some I like, other’s not so much.  I found an addon that has been out for a while by the name of Fox­Tab.  I have got­ten used to the Flip 3d from Vista and abso­lu­tely rely on it.  I like the way you can flip through the screenshots and select the exact win­dow you wan­ted.  Fox­Tab now gives me that feel with Fire­fox tabs.

Like most users, I tend to have 5–10 tabs ope­ned at the mini­mum at any one time.  With a RightC­lick and roll of the wheel, you have a cus­to­mi­za­ble 3d Inter­face.  From chan­ging the color screen, to how many tiles, the layout.  Anything to make it easier for you.

To me, this is one of those Addons you just say, “Thank You Lord”.  With 5 stars and 610 great reviews, it seems like many peo­ple think that.  Fire­fox users, do your­sel­ves a favor and give it a try.

1 comment - What do you think?  Posted by Diego - July 21, 2009 at 4:43 pm

Categories: Firefox   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New Computer Security Mistakes

I wan­ted to pass on what I see as some of the top com­pu­ter secu­rity mis­ta­kes that most casual com­pu­ters users make when first set­ting up a new computer:

  1. Set­ting an non pro­tec­ted newly ima­ged com­pu­ter on the inter­net.  Before ins­ta­lling any com­pu­ter on the inter­net, you will want to ins­tall at least an anti­vi­rus and make sure that the built in fire­wall for Win­dows is ope­ned.  I per­so­nally have a DVD with a lot of first ins­tall appli­ca­tions on it.  This inc­lu­des Comodo Anti­vi­rus, Comodo Fire­wall, Win­dows XP Ser­vice Pack 3 (Net­work Admin Ins­ta­ller), and Vista Ser­vice Pack 2 (Net­work Admin Ins­ta­ller).  As well as a few other odds and ends.  I run these ins­talls before I ever con­nect my machine to the wire­less net­work.  I know the virus defi­ni­tion files for the Anti­vi­rus will be out­da­ted, but that is correc­ted shortly.
  2. Not run­ning upda­tes as soon as online. After ins­ta­lling all the appli­ca­tions men­tio­ned above, I get my sys­tem on the net­work and run upda­tes on my anti­vi­rus soft­ware and then run­ning the Win­dows Update.  This is a very impor­tant step.  Just because an anti­vi­rus is ins­ta­lled or the latest Ser­vice Pack applied, it does not mean you are pro­tec­ted.  With more and more vul­ne­ra­bi­li­ties and viru­ses being relea­sed daily, it is a never ending battle to keep your­self pro­tec­ted.  Not only should you worry about the secu­rity soft­ware, but any appli­ca­tion you ins­tall, please run all the updates.
  3. Set­ting your pri­mary login ID as an admi­nis­tra­tor.  I know this one is hard, but it has been brought to my atten­tion, and right­fully so, it is not recom­men­ded.  An admi­nis­tra­tor account has unli­mi­ted rights and power on a com­pu­ter.  You can create a sepa­rate user and make is a power user.  For the Admi­nis­tra­tor account, you should rename it from Admi­nis­tra­tor and put a secure pass­word on it.  Also, disa­ble the guest account on your sys­tem for safety measures.

  1. Pass­word, Pass­word, Pass­word, and did I men­tion pass­word?  I know this is your home com­pu­ter and you won­der who would get into it.  Well, since the com­pu­ter has become so inte­gra­ted in our lives, we store everything on there.  From bank infor­ma­tion, impor­tant docu­ments, Tax infor­ma­tion, fami­lies infor­ma­tion, on and on.  If your com­pu­ter gets sto­len, someone else now has all of that infor­ma­tion.  If you do not have a secure pass­word (see ear­lier pos­ting) then it’s easy for them to get in.
  2. Disk Encryp­tion.This is a topic I will dis­cuss more in depth in the next few days.  There are many free drive encryp­tion appli­ca­tions avai­la­ble that are very very good.  The rea­son for this encryp­tion is so that if someone comes in and just grabs your drive out of your com­pu­ter (less then 3 minu­tes for the most part) your data is secu­red.  See item 4.
  3. Wire­less Net­work Secu­rity. Again another topic I will get into later, but for the most part I can sum it up quickly.  If you get a brand new wire­less rou­ter, the defaults are the same.  The same IP address, the same root pass­word, the same SSID (Net­work name).  With this infor­ma­tion anyone in your area can get into your net­work.  There are some things you can do to pro­tect your­self and I plan on dis­cus­sing it later, inc­lu­ding what some recom­men­ded set­tings are.  So please check back.

I hope that you found this use­ful infor­ma­tion.  Ques­tions, com­ments and feed­back is always welcome.

5 comments - What do you think?  Posted by Diego - July 3, 2009 at 9:36 am

Categories: General   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Office 2007 Ribbon Bar

As we rolled out Office 2007 in my office, one of the things that came up quite a bit was the new Rib­bon bar.  Per­so­nally, I think the grou­pings of the options are well thought out and very intui­tive.  But, even with all the gui­des in the world, some users wan­ted the clas­sic tool­bar back.

Always on the hunt to make my users happy, I keep loo­king for little tools that they can use.  I came across this one the other day.

It is called Rib­bon­Cus­to­mi­zer and can be found here.  There are two ver­sions, the free and pro­fes­sio­nal ver­sion.  Yes the free ver­sion is very wate­red down, but for the stan­dard user I think it will work fine.   For 30 days you do get a trial of the full ver­sion, but I am not sure if it is worth the $30 to purchase it. Per­so­nally, I would get used to the new inter­face for that price.

The ins­ta­lla­tion seems very straight for­ward and easy to follow.  Please note that if you have Vista and mul­ti­ple users on that com­pu­ter you will have to ins­tall it for each user.  That would be nice in some fami­lies where one per­son likes the bar and the other doesn’t.

After the ins­ta­lla­tion you will notice a new option in the rib­bon bar labe­led Clas­si­cUI.  If you select that tab, the old tool­bar back.

If you know of another option, please don’t hesi­tate to let me know.

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Diego - July 2, 2009 at 7:06 pm

Categories: SW   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Vista Update Error 0×80070424 — Fix

I am not sure how many Vista users there are out there, but I have it ins­ta­lled on my work lap­top. So far I have not been unhappy with the OS, but there are some things I am not all that exci­ted about. But, the point of this post has noting to do with that.

Yes­ter­day after­noon I reboo­ted my machine and had a secu­rity alert that my auto­ma­tic update was not ena­bled. I was get­ting the follo­wing error: Error 0×80070424. I was searching around the net for a fix and kept being told to just re-register the wuauserv.dll. While that see­med like it wor­ked, the next time I ran an update the error retur­ned. But with some per­se­ve­rance I fount the follo­wing fix that wor­ked like a charm:

Start-run-type the follo­wing com­mand and press enter
%SYSTEMROOT%\SYSTEM32\REGSVR32.EXE %SYSTEMROOT%\SYSTEM32\WUAUENG.DLL

Or try this method:
1. Click on Start, and then click Run.
2. Type cmd in the Open box to get a DOS prompt.
3. Type net stop wuau­serv and press Enter.
4.Now delete (or put in recycle bin) the con­tents of
C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution (but not the Soft­wa­re­Dis­tri­bu­tion fol­der)
(doesn’t mat­ter if some will not go)
5. Type net start wuau­serv at the com­mand prompt, and
press Enter.
6. Now try Win­dows Update again.

- Diego

1 comment - What do you think?  Posted by Diego - June 2, 2009 at 7:31 am

Categories: Vista   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

9 visitors online now
9 guests, 0 members
Max visitors today: 9 at 01:28 am CST
This month: 16 at 03-05-2010 08:37 am CST
This year: 19 at 02-08-2010 05:10 am CST
All time: 21 at 12-18-2009 02:01 am CST